Talk:Association of the Christian faithful

Heralds of the Gospel

removed this addition as not notable: The 3rd millenium had its first with the Heralds of the Gospel. A more useful addition would be a stub article on this secular institute.

Canon Law - Religious Text?

I did not know canon law was considered a primary religious text. The Bible is, maybe the Catechism of the Catholic Church is but I doubt Canon law is. Canon law is simply that, LAW, but law specifically for inside the Church. Obviously it is a primary source but I at least some citation of the appropriate law (primary source) accompanied by secondary sources seems proper for an article on a particular legal entity. >> M.P.Schneider,LC (parlemus • feci) 17:30, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

It seems rather strange that the quoting of the Catechism and Canon Law would be deemed "inapropriate" in an article dealing with an purely ecclesiastical entity of which there aren't likely to be any critical secondary sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.84.228 (talk) 11:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

The box was removed since nobody has defended or fully explained its inclusion in a year. >> M.P.Schneider,LC (parlemus • feci) 17:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Associations of the faithful. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110926093316/http://www.vatican.va:80/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/laity/documents/rc_pc_laity_doc_20051114_associazioni_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/laity/documents/rc_pc_laity_doc_20051114_associazioni_en.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110926093316/http://www.vatican.va:80/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/laity/documents/rc_pc_laity_doc_20051114_associazioni_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/laity/documents/rc_pc_laity_doc_20051114_associazioni_en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Same subject?

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Christianity/Noticeboard#What_to_do_with_those_two_articles?. Veverve (talk) 00:33, 26 December 2021 (UTC)