This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Stop your disruptive POV deletions on several Assyrian- or Iraq-related articles or you will be blocked. Since your official arrival on wikipedia (I guess an IP and content analysis would show you "existed" here before under another identity) less than two months ago you have persistenly deleted sourced material and tried to let whole articles be deleted, always following a clearly ideological agenda. Wikipedia is not some propaganda playground for nationalists of all kind. --Pylambert (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
ܥܝܪܐܩ, please be aware that you are not allowed to remove the comments of other users from talk pages. You're free to exercise this practice on your own talk page, but you may not do so on the talk page of any other pages without good reason. — ξxplicit21:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)Reply