Talk:Astaroth (Soulcalibur)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   There were a few spelling and grammar mistakes that I fixed, but it's okay now.

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   If you're planning to take this to FAC soon, InsertCredit probably won't be considered notable.

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   I'm not going to hold you off for this, but the fair use rationale for the image could use a little beefing-up.

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   I don't think any of your video game character articles have screenshots. I guess the article is okay without one.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I'm passing it. Good work, Kung Fu Man. Another GA from one of the most consistent contributors to video game-related articles that I've ever seen. By the way, would you mind reviewing Lego Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy for me? Tezkag72 (talk) 22:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)