Talk:Astronomical chronology

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Needs material from other cultures

edit

The header says it all; this new page needs comparative materials from other cultures where astronomical dating has been used: Ancient China, Classical western antiquity, and Mesoamerica spring to mind. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 21:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Needs astronomical chronology

edit

Needs refs to and some superficial description of Julian date, Julian year (astronomy), Besselian year, Epoch (astronomy), Ephemeris time and such. Astronomical chronology is a lesser nightmare, although well defined. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 15:14, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

And Dynamic time, Barycentric Dynamical Time, Terrestrial Time/Terrestrial Dynamical Time, International Atomic Time, Geocentric Coordinate Time, Barycentric Coordinate Time, and maybe it is a greater nightmare. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 15:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

As currently written, this article concerns archeaology, and almost none of the articles you mention have anything to do with dating artifacts. A possible exception would be Julian day. — Joe Kress (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Astronomical chronology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Astronomical chronology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply