Talk:Asturian Valley cattle

Latest comment: 8 years ago by SMcCandlish in topic Further sources for article improvement

Further sources for article improvement

edit
Interesting that if I dare (as I did at what is now Talk:Asturian Mountain cattle#Requested moves) to suggest renaming something as naturally ambiguous as Asturian Mountain and Asturian Valley to more sensible names (and consensus goes along with me eventually), it generates an enormous torrent of activistic sourcing attempts to "prove me wrong", none of which contribute in any way to article improvement. When I then do a large amount of source digging, for the benefit of the same "breed article editing" editors who claim I'm just some interloper who "doesn't work on breed articles" (despite the fact that I work on them quite often), absolutely zero activity from the same people occurs, and the article is not improved for 8 months running, no matter how many sources I find for them to use. This is not an isolated case. That's very, very curious.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  08:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
It has now been 17 months if my math is right.  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  06:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply