GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Atari 800 (Homecomputer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) 13:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


I'll give this a go. Hey, it's been several decades since I've seen one of these. I've had a spin through the article and I can't see any obvious reason to quickfail it, so I'll give it the full review. My initial concern is that at 55K of prose, the article might be a bit long compared to contemporary computers such as the Apple II and the Commodore 64, although neither of those have been improved to GA. I see quite a bit of unsourced technical information; that'll need sorting out too.

I tend to copyedit as I go and raise issues as and when I find them. Specific comments will follow. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

General

edit
  • I'm concerned there isn't enough distinctive information to spin this article out of its parent, Atari 8-bit family.

Lead

edit
  • Why is the article not called Atari 800? There's no need to disambiguate.
  • I think the opening sentence needs to be fleshed out a bit. Compare with the GA ZX81, which mentions the manufacturing dates, sales figures, overall response, and clones.
  • "The Atari 800 was initially only offered in the US mail order business from the end of 1979" - does this mean the computer was first available only in the US, and only via mail order?
  • "it was possible to continuously increase awareness - I don't understand what this means

History

edit
  • "The engineers' efforts were mainly focused on expanding the graphics capabilities of the highly integrated special circuit Television Interface Adapter (TIA) built into the Atari 2600." - what does "highly integrated" mean here?
  • "still from the high acquisition costs." - what does this mean?
  • "cost a total of more than ten million US dollars" - can we get a conversion to adjust for inflation using Template:Conversion?
  • The 6 December 1978 launch date and press release in the New York Times isn't cited, I've added a tag
  • The "Marketing" subsection is quite small - it could do with being merged elsewhere
  • The "Tapping into the education sector" subsection could be trimmed down to something like "Education"

Summary

edit

Unclear why this is separate from the Atari 8-bit family article

edit

All of the Atari 8-bit computer models have the same tech—CPU, graphics, audio—and Atari 8-bit family covers this and the development of the 400 and 800. Having a short article that talks about the specs of the 800 makes sense, but this feels like a parallel version of the existing article. Why put this information in two places? Dgpop (talk) 21:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Dgpop:; I agree- the justification for a separate Atari 800 article is inherently flawed.
As the "main" original model (with the 400), it forms the basis of the series as a whole, so separate articles for each (i.e. Atari 8-bit family and Atari 800) are inherently going to cover the same ground and overlap massively.
(For others reading, it should be noted that there's a more in-depth discussion on this at the "Atari 8-bit family" talk page).
Ubcule (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply