Talk:Atari XF551
 | A fact from Atari XF551 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 21:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
- ... that although it was considered the best floppy drive produced by Atari, the XF551 was only released after Nintendo sued them? Source: Radliff, page 9
- ALT1: that Atari only released the XF551 floppy disk drive after a Nintendo lawsuit forced them to? Source: Radliff, page 9
- ALT2: that even though it was "the best thing to happen to the Atari", the XF551 floppy disk drive was only released after Nintendo sued them? Source: van Dijk page 54 and Radliff page 9
- Comment: QPQ popcorn shrimp.
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 17:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
Image eligibility:
- Freely licensed:
- Used in article:
- Clear at 100px:
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
@Maury Markowitz: Long enough, sourced, and neutral. Everything on my end looks good, my only concern being the image, and if it is published under the stated copyright. I am unsure of how to verify it, given the source is simply a link to the image URL, and if you are able to address that single concern it should be 100% good on my end! Additionally, not a huge issue, but you misspelled "Ratcliff" as "Radliff" which threw me off on finding the source for a moment (I was convinced you used a factoid that wasn't in the article for a second there!). Good work on the nomination! As soon as I am certain the image is free I'll give you the goahead! Ornithoptera (talk) 00:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ornithoptera: I was not sure where to put the link to the license - i thought the commons upload process would ask, but nope. Anyway, as you can see on the page's license page, all images are CC-by-4.0 : https://planet-irata.net/en/copyright/#own !!!!
Awesome! You're all set @Maury Markowitz:! Good work and it was nice working with you! Thank you for the clarification and good work on the article! Ornithoptera (talk) 01:25, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Ornithoptera: I was not sure where to put the link to the license - i thought the commons upload process would ask, but nope. Anyway, as you can see on the page's license page, all images are CC-by-4.0 : https://planet-irata.net/en/copyright/#own !!!!
ALT2 to T:DYK/P6 without image