 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 14:23, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Notability
editThis article was created in 2005 and it still does not have references by which the notability (i.e., a subject that merit's having a stand alone article) is established. Perhaps it should b merged with other similar recording labels that lack the established notability. Pknkly (talk) 15:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Did you look for any references? Flowerparty☀ 23:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Took a goodgle peek. There seems to be plenty of stuff to sort through. Hope someone from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Record Labels Task Force will take interest. Pknkly (talk) 02:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Doesn't the fact that there's a lot to sort through in itself suggest this label might be notable? These unreferenced tags are unsightly; please make a little effort before applying them to an article and requesting work from others. There's enough here and here to justify an article. I'm removing the tags. Flowerparty☀ 16:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Took a goodgle peek. There seems to be plenty of stuff to sort through. Hope someone from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies/Record Labels Task Force will take interest. Pknkly (talk) 02:14, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the interest and the time to improve the article. Pknkly (talk) 08:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)