This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Similar to Wulfhelm, this is a very good article on someone who, while notable, has little information available about him.
1. Well written?: Deals well with ambiguity, and covers the interesting aspects that make him notable clearly, despite difficulty.
2. Factually accurate?: Sources look quite good
3. Broad in coverage?: As said above, this article deals well with the conflict between notability and lack of information. It's short, but comprehensive.
4. Neutral point of view?: No issues
5. Article stability?: No issues
6. Images?: Not possible; as explained in the article, no coins exist with him, and I'm quite happy to believe that any other images are either obscure or unavailable. Adam Cuerden(talk)21:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There is a footnote referring to "Dolley "Important Group" British Museum Quarterly", but this item does not appear in the references. Ælfgar (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
