Talk:Atherstone Hunt

Warwickshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Warwickshire, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Warwickshire. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Please also feel free to join in the discussions on the project's talk page.WarwickshireWikipedia:WikiProject WarwickshireTemplate:WikiProject WarwickshireWikiProject Warwickshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atherstone Hunt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.mfha.org.uk/index.php?option=com_directory&listing=Atherstone+Hunt&page=viewListing&lid=112&Itemid=71
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516034604/http://www.pointtopoint.co.uk/go/news/atherstone_rep.html to http://www.pointtopoint.co.uk/go/news/atherstone_rep.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dlraa.co.uk/HUNT_SUPPORTS_AIR_AMBULANCE.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

History neutrality

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The history section of this article is riddled with opinion and NPOV emotive language. Needs a professional NPOV edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.187.239.168 (talk) 13:32, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Added that all seemingly emotive language are clearly linked to true facts and can be verified.

This passage is even less neutral than the newspaper article that it cites (present tense, meaningful dwelling on minutiae, epithets and turns of phrase that describe a relatively mundane event like a war crime):

The video footage shows the dogs chase a fox across a field. As the hounds tear into the fox with their teeth, a member of the hunt reaches down and pulls the lifeless body of the animal from underneath the pack and slings it over the front of a colleague’s horse.

For the purposes of neutrality and readability, and in context (the footage was offered as a proof of alleged, illegal, controversial activity; police evidence) it should read something like this:

The video footage showed a pack of dogs chasing a fox across a field and killing it. Following them was a party of riders wearing traditional hunting garb; one of the riders picked up the carcass and slung it over a horse's back. AyeBraine (talk) 10:19, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Add topic