Talk:Atherton, Greater Manchester/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Overall summary
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive, wide-ranging, well-referenced, well-illustrated GA-class article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well-referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well-referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Wide-ranging.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well-illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well-illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Another GA-class article. You're getting good at this. Congratulations on the quality. Pyrotec (talk) 12:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, can I still eat the cake? It's all thanks to Malleus Fatuorum & Fingerpuppet really, especially MF who was so generous with his time. --J3Mrs (talk) 12:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes why not have a celebration - better send MF an extra big piece of cake. Pyrotec (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)