Talk:Atherton, Greater Manchester/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 22:27, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, wide-ranging, well-referenced, well-illustrated GA-class article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    Well-referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    Well-referenced.
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Wide-ranging.
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    Well-illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Well-illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Another GA-class article. You're getting good at this. Congratulations on the quality. Pyrotec (talk) 12:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much, can I still eat the cake? It's all thanks to Malleus Fatuorum & Fingerpuppet really, especially MF who was so generous with his time. --J3Mrs (talk) 12:40, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes why not have a celebration - better send MF an extra big piece of cake. Pyrotec (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply