Talk:Athletics at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Women's 100 metres hurdles

Degrading article

This article is extremely degrading to the athletes that actually won medals for this event. It comprises of 5-6 lines of text mainly talking about the athlete that came in 5th, even going as far as informing us about her later endeavours and presenting the winning athlete as if having won by chance ("In seemingly an instant, Voula Patoulidou became the gold medalist"). Avoiding stumbling on the hurdles is an essential skill in this event, it's not something to lament or regret upon, as if one who doesn't is unlucky.

I will at least remove the last line, since it has nothing to do with the event, and try to remove any degrading or condescending comments, but I still propose a revision of the content focusing more towards the actual event and its winners. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.2.199 (talk) 18:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Athletics at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Women's 100 metres hurdles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120601033532/http://todor66.com/olim/1992/Athletics/Women_100m_Hurdles.html to http://todor66.com/olim/1992/Athletics/Women_100m_Hurdles.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Athletics at the 1992 Summer Olympics – Women's 100 metres hurdles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090508115750/http://www.olympic-museum.de/o-reports/report1992.htm to http://www.olympic-museum.de/o-reports/report1992.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Gail Devers definitely wasn't the favorite, unless you're talking about the final. Lyudmila Narozhilenko was the heavy favorite at the start of the Games, until she injured herself and had to withdraw from the semifinals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmak76 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)