This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Atlantic pockets article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please do not remove the {{interlanguage link}}s in the pockets table. These contain links to fully-developed article on fr-wiki, that could be used to develop new articles at en-wiki. Normally, these pocket links would be red since there are no articles for these pocket topics, such as "La Rochelle pocket". But, note that La Rochelle pocket is blue; not because there's an article, but because of a redirect, and it points back here. These redirects are also used in other articles. Since they point back here, that means they are circular, normally a cause for removal from an article, but not in this case. See MOS:CIRCULAR for a more detailed explanation, but basically since these links are expandable into new articles (and are so marked by the appropriate redirect category at the redirect itself), they are exempt from removal for this reason. Mathglot (talk) 05:40, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
