Wikipedia

Talk:Atlas Copco

Latest comment: 11 months ago by 90.235.6.173 in topic Spelling and name
Learn more about this page

Clean-up

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is obviously in need of a major clean-up. I took the first step today by fixing some minor problems, and marking some of the problem areas. / Gavleson (talk) 22:38, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply


Its not that obvious actually... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcymike123 (talk • contribs) 18:31, 12 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Atlas Copco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2016

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello, I would to ask permission to edit this page. The history needs to be updated and many other things Marcymike123 (talk) 12:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atlas Copco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Big problems here

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi all. I'm sure that at least one person has seen the tags I have slapped at the top of the article and is not happy so please let me explain what the problems are:

  1. The article is written far too much from an insider's point of view. I recognise the tone of it as the way a company pitches itself internally to its own employees. Most large companies have an internal monologue that sounds like this. Trouble is that this is not for external consumption. It is not telling our readers (who are mostly not insiders) what they want to know. Some if it just sounds plain stupid. I have removed some of the worst of it but enough remains to be a problem. The two main tone problems are "peacock" terms, which are meaningless words used to sound impressive, and "management jargon" terms, which are basically the sort of nonsense words that the Pointy-haired Boss from Dilbert uses.
  2. The article is referenced far too much from an insider's point of view. It seems that they put some internal information on their website that some other companies would keep internal on their intranets. That's fine, but it doesn't means that we need to include that stuff in the article or use the internal references.

So, how can we clean this up? Let me give you an example based on something I already removed:

There was a dreadful section on "internal awards". It was referenced to an internal source. Of course, there won't be any valid external references because (whisper it) nobody gives a tuppenny damn about other companies internal awards! There is no outsiders view of this because it is a purely internal matter. This could, and should, have been avoided by trying to find an external reference, failing to find one, realising that this means that the section was not appropriate for Wikipedia and then not adding it.

I believe that is the way forward: Get everything referenced to independent, reliable sources and let them guide both the content and the tone of our coverage, (without plagiarising them). --DanielRigal (talk) 12:51, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atlas Copco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atlas Copco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Atlas Copco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

New Group identity and other things

edit
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello all,

This page seems a bit outdated. Here are some suggestions:

- The biggest one is that Atlas Copco Group has a new identity which is separate from the Atlas Copco brand and serves as umbrella for all brands in the Group. Looking at other companies like Volkswagen Group/Volkswagen brand or Alphabet/Google - I think the best way is to set up a new page. One should be the corporate, and the other should be about the brand itself. Here is a link to press-release https://www.atlascopcogroup.com/en/media/corporate-press-releases/2023/20231113-new-group-identity I don't really know how to approach this in a good way, but it seems having two pages one for Group, one for brand is the way to go.

- I did this changes in the past but someone updated it again. Names of Business Areas now show as [Name] Technology, when the actual names end with Technique.

- The financial results are outdated for 2 years. Last one showing are from 2020. The latest report is here https://www.atlascopcogroup.com/content/dam/atlas-copco/group/documents/investors/financial-publications/english/20230322-annual-report-incl-sustainability-report-and-corporate-governance-report-2022.pdf

- The current photos of products shown are from old mining equipment (which is now Epiroc) so it's not relevant. Lemoncubes (talk) 11:46, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Spelling and name

edit
Latest comment: 11 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Fredrik Didro should be Fredrik Herman Didron 90.235.6.173 (talk) 15:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Atlas_Copco&oldid=1222724737"