This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and Ireland, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Biota of Great Britain and IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Biota of Great Britain and IrelandBiota of Great Britain and Ireland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article had an importance automatically assigned to it. Once it has been checked by a human, please remove |autoi=yes.
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It would make sense for this article to expand the history and cover the full series of publications, from Perring & Walter's 1962 edition, right up to Preston, Pearman and Dines' 2002 New Atlas of the British & Irish Flora, and incorporating the 1968 Critical Supplement. I think this would make a well-rounded and more notable article, and probably not even need a name-change. I hope others agree? It has been added to my 'to do' list! Parkywiki (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply