Talk:AtmosFear (Liseberg)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AtmosFear (Liseberg) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Lisebergstornet merge
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge...
Any objections to me merging Lisebergstornet into this article? Seems odd to link to an article containing 3 sentences about a very similar topic. Themeparkgc Talk 22:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'd support this.--Astros4477 (talk) 04:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on AtmosFear (Liseberg). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929132654/http://www.emporis.com/ge/wm/bu/?id=218210 to http://www.emporis.com/ge/wm/bu/?id=218210
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 20 October 2016 (UTC)