Talk:Atmospheric model

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Thegreatdr in topic Duplication

What's still missing

edit

A section on model parameterizations, which is likely to focus on clouds and precipitation. References for each model individually listed. Thegreatdr (talk) 12:10, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Aside from having no information on ensembles, how would this article be different from Numerical weather prediction? More detail on each major kind of model? Something else? Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:30, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
I'm thinking about that myself, and would like some feedback about what more could be within this article to differentiate it from the NWP article. There is quite a bit of overlap, but that seems unavoidable. For now, there's talk of paramaterization on this page, and not the NWP article, though that could change during FAC depending upon what comments we receive there. This would be the page to elaborate on the guidance individually, though most of that should be on their respective subpages. We could elaborate more about which models use MOS here, since it does seem special to the NCEP guidance. It's the same predicament we're in between the weather and meteorology pages. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Well, we could try to explain what the differences between barotropic, thermotropic, multi-layer baroclinic, and primitive equation models are. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 20:42, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
We could include a "types" section which discusses that. Good idea. Some of that may already be buried within this article's prose. I'll separate it out. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Should there be some reference to the early climate models, such as those of Budyko and Sellers? http://wiki.nsdl.org/index.php/PALE:ClassicArticles/GlobalWarming/Article11 and http://www.aip.org/history/climate/simple.htm#SBS Chogg (talk) 23:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Duplication

edit

The table of contents of atmospheric model follows that of numerical weather prediction too closely; in fact, some sections seem to be entirely copy & pastes. fgnievinski (talk) 16:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Fgnievinski: These sections were copied in this revision by User:Thegreatdr. Jarble (talk) 23:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Since some of the sections were directly copied, they could be included in this article using the {{Excerpt}} template. Jarble (talk) 23:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
Back when the articles were written, that template was unknown, at least to me. And you can see we were wondering about the similarity of the two articles nine years ago. This is a subarticle of Numerical Weather Prediction, which doesn't simply involve forecasting of the atmosphere. Thegreatdr (talk) 01:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Atmospheric model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Atmospheric model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Atmospheric model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply