Talk:Ato Boldon

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Letter to John Smith

edit

So there seems to be some dispute about the authenticity of this section, with several reverts by User:Tonylongman and various IP users (same person?). Let's talk about this here before continuing an edit war. Why should this section be removed? It is in fact the only actual sourced content in the entire article. The story on the letter was published by a major newspaper in the UK (And mentioned in major newspapers in Trinidad [1] [2]). What basis is there that this should not be mentioned? Please remember the Wikipedia is not for Orginal research, we are just an encyclopedia of published information. Rasadam (talk) 07:26, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I put the article up for review at the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard in an effort to have some additional opinions weighed in on the issue. I was hoping the user(s) that kept removing the section would participate in discussing it, but it doesn't appear to be happening. If they read this, I would suggest discussing the issue here/there asap. Rasadam (talk) 06:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ato Boldon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply