Talk:Attila Hildmann
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Attila Hildmann. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140517133955/https://vebu.de/aktuelles/news/1201-vegan-for-fun-gewinnt-auszeichnung-zum-kochbuch-des-jahres-2012 to https://vebu.de/aktuelles/news/1201-vegan-for-fun-gewinnt-auszeichnung-zum-kochbuch-des-jahres-2012
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
2 different demonstrations
editThere were several different ralleys, organized by different groups. As Süddeutsche reports, the Embassy gathering was not organized by Querdenken, see: https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/demonstration-berlin-corona-massnahmen-hildmann-1.5014391 (in German) --Nillurcheier (talk) 11:37, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
The article claims that the rallies were registered by two different people, it does not, however, state that the organizers were not from within "Querdenken." In fact, a strategy of "Querdenken" was to ask people at local rallies to file applications for rallies in Berlin. There must have been dozens if not hundreds of rallies applied for by "Querdenken" people. Therefore, it seems most likely, that the rally in question was also a rally organized from within "Querdenken" (not registered by the leader of the movement himself, though). We need to find further reliable sources on that issue to change the article. If we don't, we should consider getting rid of this question in the article altogether. Maybe something like "in the wake of rallies organized by..." could be a compromise in the meantime? 78.43.101.105 (talk) 23:41, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- I could agree with the propossed compromise. However, I'd like to rise a second question. It is the article about the crazy chef, why would you add an information about who organized which rally?
"Hate speech" in the section header
editGot reverted by FMSky for adding "hate speech" to the section header.
We have an official arrest warrant for this alleged crime since Feb 2021, as well his sponsors' reasoning for withdrawing, and several media articles calling Hildmann's public statements thus: it's well sourced. Would you agree to "Allegations of hate speech"? --ΟΥΤΙΣ (talk) 01:19, 13 July 2021 (UTC)