Talk:Audio electronics

Improving this Article

I just made improvements to the definition and provided hyperlinks to Wikipedia articles for related terms. I also added references for the definition and the list of example audio electronic components (as well as adding a few to the list itself). I put a see also section in as well. I should provide more detail than the general definition/overview in the near future, provided no one beats me to it or makes drastic edits to the article before then. This was my first edit of any kind for Wikipedia, and I was wondering how members of the community would judge or grade these edits thus far, so your feedback is welcome. --Cp99-NJITWILL (talk) 02:03, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

There is a place in the Wikiproject for requesting article assesments. It's not used much but I answer a lot of the few requests that are made there. I would assess this as still being "Stub" quality. It needs a lot more prose (rather than lists) before I would move it to "Start" quality or above. This wikiproject does not give detailed reviews of articles, they just look at the article and change the assesment in the template. Some wikiprojects like Military History have a much more structured and detailed review process, but if you want that depth of review on an electronics project you need to take it to one of the formal processes outside the wikiproject such as GA or Peer Review, but the article is not yet advanced enough to need that sort of treatment. As I said to you at the Wikiproject, if you can expand this quickly (their rules include it must be new -be sure to read them) the first place I would take this is DYK. They will probably review the article more thoroughly than the wikiproject and will certainly highlight any serious non-technical problems.

Basically, just carry on. If no one says anything you are probably doing fine, I am watching the page and will let you know if you are going seriously wrong. If you need help on anything specific you can ask me on my talk page. SpinningSpark 10:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. You have been very helpful to me every step of the way, and it is much appreciated.

I had thought there would be a section for that in the projects page, but I missed where the link was for it on the page. I had clicked on the article assessment hyperlink in the contents box at the top of the page, which brought me to the box with the quality ratings, but the link for the article assessment page is in subpage section. That location makes more sense now that I look back in hindsight. I wasn't really looking to submit it for an actual formal process like Peer Review at the moment, but its still good to know about should I ever want to. I definitely agree that it is still a stub quality article, as there is still a good deal that would need to be done on it for it be classified as something more. A little improvement at the very least was better than nothing, just to get the ball rolling, since this article had been relatively unchanged for its approximately 7 year existence. --Cp99-NJITWILL (talk) 19:51, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Audio electronics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218201605/https://ccrma.stanford.edu/courses/192a/1-Basic_Electronics.pdf to https://ccrma.stanford.edu/courses/192a/1-Basic_Electronics.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://doc.isiri.org.ir/documents/10129/21373/Audio_and_Hi-Fi_Handbook_3E.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)