Talk:Audio over Ethernet
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Layer?
edit"Over Ethernet" implies that the audio application sits on top of Ethernet's layer 2. "Layer 1 Audio over Ethernet" is more likely "Audio over Cat 5". "Audio over IP" is just that, no matter what media TCP/IP sits on top of. Since the text also lacks substantial references I'm going to weed this out unless there are any objections. -- Zac67 (talk) 20:31, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by "weed this out" but I don't see a problem here. Layer 1 protocols use the Ethernet physical layer. Layer 2 protocols use the Ethernet MAC layer. Both are audio over Ethernet. Layer 3 protocols are generally IP and there is a prominent link to Audio over IP in that section. Some audio over IP implementations assume IP over Ethernet so it is reasonable to include some discussion here. ~KvnG 20:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- There isn't anything Ethernet on a simple Cat 5 cable. To call it "Ethernet" it would need to use at least the same layer 1 encoding and packet structure, ie. being propagated through Ethernet repeaters/hubs. Running a digital signal of some kind over a TP cable can't reasonably be called Ethernet. -- Zac67 (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- All the systems listed in Audio_over_Ethernet#Layer_1_protocols use an Ethernet PHY so they use Ethernet electrical and byte encoding but not necessarily Ethernet packet structure. ~KvnG 15:15, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for checking this out. Apparently, I was a bit jumping to conclusions a bit too quickly – however, at least RockNet doesn't seem to use Ethernet, just Cat5 cabling. I'll check them out and move those to §Similar concepts. -- Zac67 (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Audio over Ethernet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141114221604/http://www.supermac-hypermac.com:80/ to http://www.supermac-hypermac.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011192134/http://www.aviom.com/Products/Aviom-About-A-Net.cfm to http://www.aviom.com/Products/Aviom-About-A-Net.cfm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://community.calrec.com/network-wednesdays-hydra/ - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120902124453/http://trac.jackaudio.org:80/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack to http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/WalkThrough/User/NetJack
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)