Talk:Audit Integrity and Job Protection Act
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Helpful links to add info from
editIn case anyone is interested, here are a few links to articles/websites I found while researching this and didn't have time to add anything from.
- Letter of support from Center for Capital Markets
- Article from Accounting Today
- Article from Accounting Today 2012 on auditor rotation idea
- article from GoingConcern on hidden upside to the bill
- press release in support from biotech industry
- Article from CFO opposed to house involvement in private industry matter
Thanks! HistoricMN44 (talk) 20:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Audit Integrity and Job Protection Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130819055653/http://www.opencongress.org/bill/113-h1564/show to http://www.opencongress.org/bill/113-h1564/show
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131415330600/http://www.gop.gov/bill/113/1/hr1564 to http://www.gop.gov/bill/113/1/hr1564
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)