Talk:Audrey Gelman
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Audrey Gelman be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Help
edit | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am a new to editing information on Wikipedia. I am not sure if I properly referenced the new information I added to this profile (in the career section) as my References look different than those added before me. Please let me know if they are valid. Also, how do I "clean up" a page such as this one? Thank you. (Chelseablogger (talk) 16:41, 4 August 2014 (UTC))
- Using a citation template like {{cite web}} is preferred to using bare URLs as references. See WP:Referencing for beginners on how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes without having to deal with the template code directly. I'll tidy up these references. Regarding the "cleanup", what's required is to make sure that the article neutrally summarizes what reliable sources report about the subject without unduly promoting or whitewashing her. Huon (talk) 20:54, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you!(Chelseablogger (talk) 21:30, 5 August 2014 (UTC))
| | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I cleaned this page up by adding the DOB, deleting COI External Links and substituted them with neutral ones. I also added recent information via press releases in the career section. Now that the page complies with the neutrality policy, how does one get rid of this banner? "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view." (Chelseablogger (talk) 15:34, 8 August 2014 (UTC)) Thank you in advance.
- I have done some additional clean-up, removing name dropping and PR-speak, and removed the maintenance tag. -- Diannaa (talk) 16:31, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
It looks great! Thank you for your prompt response and assistance. (Chelseablogger (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC))
- Now we have a stable version we can build on moving forward. I will watch-list for a while and try to help if needed. -- Diannaa (talk) 23:02, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Worth mentioning that for a so-called PR expert, she has made some disastrous choices! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.33.136 (talk) 09:46, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)