Keep It is a small article but a valid scientific moment. Also if it is possible to further explain what a patial lunar eclipses is and maybe list some previous ones. that would help to prevent a controversy over deletion.--Sbkbg (talk) 01:01, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deletion What is the point in having a different page for every total or partial lunar eclipse? I think we'd be better off having a list of full ones and a list of partial ones (unless there are particularly notable ones) and a Wiki page to describe each. Please redirect me if this argument goes on elsewhere, but it's a valid point for the deletion of this very short, uninformative, and unnecessary article. Jess xx (talk) 02:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Participation on deletion discussion should be at: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/16_August_2008_lunar_eclipse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomruen (talkcontribs) 07:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template database test

edit

I replaced the stat table with a template version, a first test of a generalize database for lunar eclipses. SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 23:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

See more at: User:SockPuppetForTomruen/saros_project

Photos and table update

edit

I added a photo gallery section for after the event.

The infotable has two forms (1) past event, (2) future event, change first line: edit article

FROM future: { {Lunarsaros138_db|PLunarEclipse2 stat table|200808}}
TO past event: { {Lunarsaros138_db|PLunarEclipse stat table|200808}}
The past event table includes a photo, can be set in: edit database
Add photo image name: |200808-capphoto=
Add photo caption text: '|200808-imphoto=...|

Tom Ruen (talk) 20:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

More photos may be on commons:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Lunar_eclipse_of_2008_August_16
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on August 2008 lunar eclipse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 21 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:23, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:18, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply