Talk:Aurealis Award

Merge proposal

I'd suggest that having an individual sub-page for each section of this award is overkill - Aurealis Award for best science fiction novel, Aurealis Award for best anthology, Aurealis Award for best collection and Aurealis Award for best science fiction short story should all be merged to sections of the main award page. There are enough reliable sources spread amongst the five pages (including this one) to create quite a strongly referenced article.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 04:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC) Also include Category:Aurealis Award winners.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 04:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Why merge, each article is a strongly referenced article in themselves. Science fiction novel is a featured list, science fiction short story is a step away from being a featured list, and anthology and collect could also be featured lists after a year or two. If you merged every single winner and nominee from every list the Aurealis Awards page would be ridiculus. Also you wouldnt merge Category:Aurealis Award winners into Aurealis Awards they (being novels) would be merged to their respected authors page if they needed to be merged. Salavat (talk) 01:27, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Also you should of made this proposal on Talk:Aurealis Award, and not this redirect page. You also should of pointed the merge templates to here if you want to attract any discussion. Salavat (talk) 01:44, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

You're absolutely right, my mistake. I didn't notice I had linked to the redirect, not the main article. I have fixed this and copied this discussion over there.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 09:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Now that you mention it, there probably is a need for individual list pages given the sheer number of nominees now and into the future, but still, keeping each individual page as a standalone "article" results in lots of duplicated information explaining what the Aurealis Awards are, etc. Most of the lead paragraphs are duplicated word for word. Perhaps a good result would be to follow the pattern of Nebula Award, where most of the information is on the main page, and there are a series of sub-pages for the winners and nominees of individual categories. I quite prefer the styling of those pages too - having multiple rows for a single year's entries is a bit cluttered IMO.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 10:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

The opening lead paragraphs is a necessary condition of the Featured list, and the current style used in the lists was also a requirement of one of the featured list processes, it was done so that the table could be sortable. The Nebula Awards are not up to featured standard and so shouldnt be compared. Salavat (talk) 01:09, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Aurealis Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aurealisawards.com/index.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aurealisawards.com/media_release2.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511201221/http://aurealis.com.au//news.php?showyear=2013 to http://www.aurealis.com.au/news.php?showyear=2013
• Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5ogoxOHtM?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aurealisawards.com%2Fdownloads%2Fhistory1995_2008.pdf.pdf to http://www.aurealisawards.com/downloads/history1995_2008.pdf.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050515014256/http://www.locusmag.com:80/SFAwards/Db/Aurealis.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Aurealis.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 21 October 2016 (UTC)