Talk:Ausktribosphenos

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fossil molars believed to be placental

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Palaeos.com says that this find caused quite a stir. The molars were unmistakably features of a placental mammal. Placentals were not not supposed to be in the Australian region at this time, so it was argued whether it had to be convergent evolution or not. I don't feel like digging up the references, though. 72.73.109.8 (talk) 23:22, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Actually that information comes from the reference already on the main page by Rich et al.. 72.73.109.8 (talk) 23:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic