Talk:Australia–Philippines relations
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWhy does every single country in the world require an article about it's relations with every other country in the world? (What's wrong with their politics and history sections?) Furthermore if we took this policy of creating articles for every single country to country relationship to it's logical conclusion we could start writing articles about the relations between states!Knobbly (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Australia–Philippines relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080819195715/http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=1093&c=6079 to http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=1093&c=6079
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080819195715/http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=1093&c=6079 to http://www.samemory.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=1093&c=6079
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://foreignminister.gov.au/releases/Pages/2015/jb_mr_151204.aspx?w=tb1CaGpkPX%2FlS0K%20g9ZKEg%3D%3D
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Badly templated references
editThe article as of now has a lot of references in the form
<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://philippines.embassy.gov.au/mnla/medrel280208c.html|title=Australian Embassy in|first=corporateName= Department of Foreign Affairs and|last=Trade|website=philippines.embassy.gov.au}}</ref>, rendering like this.[1]
They need to be changed like this:
<ref>{{cite web | title=MR280208- Australia's community assistance program launches key publications on community development | publisher=Australian Embassy - The Philippines|url=https://philippines.embassy.gov.au/mnla/medrel280208c.html | date=1 October 2005}}</ref>, rendering like this.[2]
If the date is not in the page cited, it can often be found in the page source (in the example given, the line was <meta name="DC.Date.created" scheme="ISO8601" content="01/10/2005" />).
- ^ Trade, corporateName= Department of Foreign Affairs and. "Australian Embassy in". philippines.embassy.gov.au.
- ^ "MR280208- Australia's community assistance program launches key publications on community development". Australian Embassy - The Philippines. 1 October 2005.
Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 19:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)