Talk:Australia Card
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Strong views
editJust to make this very clear, I'll go to prison before I accept a bloody Australia Card! And I am not joking. - Ta bu shi da yu 11:46, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- And to think they laughed at me when I put "is still the subject of strong views" in the article! -- Kevin Ryde 22:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
- There have been rumblings of reintroducing the idea... [1] --Elliot k 05:44, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- (If a new version gets up it's probably best to start a new page. The original card has a goodly long story to it, when someone wants to tackle that. -- Kevin Ryde 22:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC))
- I've had a go. -- JackofOz 23:02, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
The Australia Card
editWe are actually running a business called The Australia Card with the website; www.theaustraliacard.com.au I wonder. would it be possible to list us under " See Also" with a reference to our card as otherwise many visitors may just continue looking for other alternatives and we miss out. With best regards, Hans SanderMuhcow (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- No sorry, not possible or permitted. Wikipedia is not a place for business promotion or advertising. --Dmol (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Australia Card. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071111004017/http://www.uow.edu.au:80/arts/sts/research/surveillance/Schweik.html to http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/research/surveillance/Schweik.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051201101310/http://www.caslon.com.au:80/australiacardprofile.htm to http://www.caslon.com.au/australiacardprofile.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
question... should this be mentioned?
editMost countries have some form of national identity card and with such a card it would be a lot easier to remove people in Australia illegally. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Should this be mentioned? In a word, No. Private opinions about such a matter have no part to play here. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 05:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
- Wasn't actually my opinion. Psephos said this when criticising the Liberals for blocking it in 1987. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 05:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)