Talk:Australian Financial Review

Australia Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Australian Financial Review is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

May 2005

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

this article should be moved back to Australian Financial Review because it almost never appears with the "the" prefix in front of it, unlike the The Sydney Morning Herald in which "The" appears in the masthead. the website simply refers to itself as Financial Review. the fact that most the incoming links are to Australian Financial Review attests to the fact that this is the most common version. clarkk 04:43, 16 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

July 2006

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The comments that are labelled "criticisms" are unsourced and need some reference to back them up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.226.173.11 (talk • contribs) 04:59, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I deleted the criticism section, as the request for a source has gone unanswered for a long time. I haven't noticed the deleted criticisms appearing in Australian discussion of the media, although the Fin has been criticised on various other grounds JQ 23:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Uploading a low resolution image of the newspaper's front page: Copyrights and Images

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Wikipedia editors, I was wondering whether anyone could shed some light as to how I could upload a non-free low resolution image of the AFR's front page in the infobox section? This is consistent with all other newspaper Wikipedia articles. The purpose of its use would be for the infobox - to provide viewers with a snapshot detailing an example of what the front page looks like. Going off of what davidwr has detailed on my personal talk page regarding WP:Non-free content criteria, I believe that a low resolution snapshot of the AFR newspaper's front page would increase the audience's understanding of the topic by showcasing the visual format of the newspaper. In compliance with criteria 3b, I would make the image's resolution lower than it was before and also crop a portion of the image to make sure only what is needed is shown. I have raised an inquiry through the file upload portal here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Australian_Financial_Review_-_20_October_2010.jpg#Summary. Please let me know if you can provide any further guidance on this matter. Thank you! Lebronverstappen (talk) 08:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic