A fact from Australian Military Court appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 August 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Australian Military Court is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Mindful of WP:BLP, I would be a little less specific in the details relating the teabagging case. I would consider removing the name of the alleged offender and the specifics of the alleged assault. This information is not necessary to make the point, or relevant to the high court decision and could be removed without lessening the encyclopedic value of the article. I am aware the information is available elsewhere but newspapers etc. have a different criteria for publishing than we do. Thoughts? -- Mattinbgn\talk06:46, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Mmm, I take your point, and I agree the article would probably not be any the less for reference to "a former RAN sailor" rather than naming the alleged offender as the article is focused on the AMC not the court case or the event. The only reason I would prefer the details of the "teabagging" case to stay is because of the hook in my WP:DYK nomination! Seriously, however, the same rationale applies, I agree. --Canley (talk) 07:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC)Reply