The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Australian Voluntary Hospital was a military hospital, staffed by expatriates, that served on the Western Front in World War I?
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Australian Voluntary Hospital is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I was led to believe that it was no 2 Australian General Hospital (2AGH) not no 3. Does anyone know if I’m correct? My apologies for editing earlier without going through the talk session. I’m new to Wikipedia & didn’t understand the protocols. Thanks Mark Waltermarkq (talk) 04:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
It is not a matter of going through the talk page (although that is what the talk page is here for) but of every edit having a reliable source (Wikipedia:Verifiability). "I was led to believe" doesn't meet our standards. Any edit without a reliable source will get reverted and you'll get a polite note to post your sources on the talk page. You should always come armed with reliable sources. Anyway, I have looked at the sources, as well as the war diaries, and have rewritten the passage. Hawkeye7(discuss)05:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
