A news item involving Australovenator was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 4 July 2009.
Wikipedia
This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Australovenator is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The WWD article is a haven for original research. Who says the polar alloaur is based on remains now known as Australovenator? Why couldn't it be Rapator, the unnamed Megaraptor-like forelimb, or some other unnamed, non-diagnostic remains? Just trying to narrow it down based on named animals is fanwanking and doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. The only way to find out what dinosaur this is supposed to be would be to ask the creators of the show which specimen they had in mind, if any. My bet is it's just meant to be a generic allosaur based on a variety of undescribed (at the time) megaraptorian material that later formed the basis of Australovenator and other things. MMartyniuk (talk) 23:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
One problem could be that it is so recently described and it seems a lot is being published on it continuously... Plus the uncertain position of megaraptora... So not entirely sure about stability yet. FunkMonk (talk) 11:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)Reply