Talk:Austrian business cycle theory/Archives/2009/February
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Further research on ABCT
A good source to cite for arguments about the ABCT:
Risk and Business Cycles: New and Old Austrian Perspectives
LK (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)\
ABCT Is Incorrect
I suppose this: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1097803 should not be part of the entry until if and when I get the next revision published. But some of the literature I reference may guide some editing. I see the article now refers to Kaldor and Sraffa, which is good. --RLV 209.217.195.125 (talk) 10:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
A good source to cite for arguments about the ABCT:
Risk and Business Cycles: New and Old Austrian Perspectives
LK (talk) 04:49, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Continuous vandal attack
Banned user Karmaisking is mounting continuous attempts to edit this page. More effective protection is needed, but in the meantime, reversion of his edits and those of his numerous socks may cause some problems. That's unfortunate, but maybe some Austrian-supporting editors would like to help put this guy out of business. JQ (talk) 11:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Archiving
I will be establishing an auto-archiver, and removing sections with socks - to the nothingworld when no interaction, to the archive when other editors' contributions need to be read in context. Objections here.--Gregalton (talk) 14:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)