Talk:Auth-Code

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Cleanup

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article is a mess. "Maybe complain"? Wikipedia isn't directly for handing out advice, perhaps this part could be more professionally written. --84.12.67.191 11:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 26th March 2007Reply

I agree, tagged for cleanup. --Hm2k (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

I rewrote the article from scratch today. I couldn't even tell which parts of the old article were old terminology and which were just speculative. --Closeapple (talk) 07:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 February 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per lack of objections (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Transfer secret → Auth-Code – No evidence that "transfer secret" is in widespread use for those code; "EPP authorization code" is common if "Auth-Code" seems ambiguous. Closeapple (talk) 07:10, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic