Talk:Auto Train

From the peer review

Auto Train (Amtrak)

This article is a collaborative effort of Vaoverland and Slambo. each of us has been working daily and/or nightly on railroad-related articles. This one should have a broad appeal to include families and younger Wikipedia readers and presents an interesting opportunity to learn more about trains, including several types of locomotives, passenger cars, auto carrier freight cars (called autoracks in trade terminology) and even the old favorite, the caboose. It is also about a new innovative business idea, making profits, growing too much, having bad luck, and bankruptcy and failure. Resurrection of failed private railroad passenger service is what Amtrak is all about, and this is an example. There is also a mention of the debate underway about privatization of such services. All photos are credited and used with permission, and we have enhanced some of the subject linked, such as autorack, and are working on the few which still lack an article. Suggestions for improvement are welcome. All aboard? Vaoverland 10:05, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Auto Train is a unique rail transportation service for both passengers and their automobiles in the United States.

In what way is it unique? Several countries have (or, in the case of Britain's Motorail, used to have) a service for transporting cars along with passengers. Loganberry 13:19, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

It's unique in the US. Autotrain and Alaska Railroad are the only two such services that I know of that operate in the US. As the quote reads, it is correct: Auto Train is a unique rail tranportation service ... in the United States. slambo 14:57, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

But if there is another such service in Alaska, then surely Autotrain can't be unique even within the US. Loganberry 16:04, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Point taken, the sentence could probably be reworded better or made specific to the 48 contiguous states. slambo 16:40, Nov 15, 2004 (UTC)

Actually, we may both have a point. According to [1], the Alaskan service was discontinued in 2000, so Auto Train is indeed unique in the USA, albeit not in the world. I've done a bit of rewording of the first sentence, to try to make it a bit clearer. Loganberry 16:49, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

To correct the above statement, the Motorail service is still operated in the United Kingdom by First Great Western between London Paddington and Penzance. (Our Phellap 21:06, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC))

In light of the above I will amend the article to clarify the first paragraph of the lead to note the service in the U.K.. Thanks. Vaoverland 21:43, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

---

Auto-trains in Europe

There are two car carrier train companies in Europe that I know of.

In Germany, Die Bahn Autozug [2] have services from 16 national stations to cities in France, Italy, Austria and Croatia. These are very popular. 200 000 cars transported yearly, half a million passengers. They are currently celebrating the 75 years of car- and person-carrying trains.

In Finland, VR [3] has a popular car-carrying service on their night-trains from the south to the north and vice versa. They have recently bought 15 new carriers for €8 million, and transports 35000 cars a year.

.... and some more:

Austria [4] has regular daytime trains (EC/IC) or night trains (EN) with automobile transport cars (DDm).

Belgium/Netherlands have "Euro Express Treincharter" [5] and "The Train Company", with semi-regular international tourist trains (including a lot of the former NMBS/SNCB and NS night rolling stock).

That list is by far not exhaustive. See also Motorail trains in Europe.

Thanks for the additional information. At the least, we can work more of this into the article. Mark in Richmond. Vaoverland 18:46, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

The information on other countries' auto trains was recently added to Intermodal passenger transport. I think the main body of non-U.S. service information should be in just one place, either there or in a new article on auto trains worldwide. --agr 14:29, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

What about the chunnel car shuttles? Patcat88 14:27, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Original research tags

Is anyone actually working on getting those removed? They have been there for 7 months now. The two sections in question are certainly unreferenced and infested with weasel words. If no one objects to this I frankly suggest that they be deleted from the article until someone is actually able to source the information in them. Dispute tags are not meant to stay there forever. They are meant as an encouragment to improve the article/section. If that doen't happen then it needs to be considered if it should be removed. MartinDK 15:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Auto-Train or auto-train?

Was the name of the original service all in lower-case, or ws that just a stlylized spelling applied to the rolling stock? 4.243.206.82 15:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Speed

70 miles per hour (113 km/h) is an odd speed. This is not the overall average and it's a little low for peak speed which over this length of track I would assume to be 79 or even 90 with these locomotives. B137 (talk) 02:43, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Clarification of sleeping car consist needed

The "Amtrak" section contains the following statement: "...6 sleepers (including a deluxe sleeper)...". This needs further explanation, as all of the AutoTrain sleepers are alike and have Deluxe Bedrooms on the upper level, along with roomettes and Family and Disabled Bedrooms (the latter on the lower level). There is no one Sleeper separately designated or marketed by Amtrak on this train as "Deluxe".  JGHowes  ^talk 01:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Auto Train. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025064809/http://www.amtrak.com/pdf/0609monthly.pdf to http://www.amtrak.com/pdf/0609monthly.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025064809/http://www.amtrak.com/pdf/0609monthly.pdf to http://www.amtrak.com/pdf/0609monthly.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060109110530/http://www.patsheridan.com:80/ to http://www.patsheridan.com
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041027014148/http://www.hebners.net:80/amtrak/amtRACK.html to http://www.hebners.net/amtrak/amtRACK.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:09, 22 October 2016 (UTC)