Talk:Autodesk Inventor

Evidence of noteworthiness

Here are some are som articles that makes it noteworthy. http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/keyDevelopments?symbol=ADSK.MU http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20091123-902965.html http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/it_telekom/allmant/article8849.ece http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20091030-907911.html

There are alot more if you bother to look. Erikhansson1 (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Here are some more. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-193598829.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-171237526.html http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-163023512.html Erikhansson1 (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Well. The first one (reuters.com) is a press release from Autodesk, or perhaps from FM Systems. The second one is a press release from Autodesk. The third one is in Swedish, which isn't helpful for the vast majority of editors here. The fourth one is also a press release from Autodesk. The first highbeam.com one is also a press release from Autodesk. Press releases are not an indication of notability; I could write my own press release about how great I am, and highbeam.com would likely publish it if I put it on the right letterhead, but that wouldn't make me or a program I wrote "notable" in the way Wikipedia means it. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Regarding highbeam.com it's a search engine for published material where you can include/exclude press releases, books, journals news papers etc. You should try it. This makes it easier to find reliable sources. The source it self is noted on the referred page and it is not highbeam.com. Let me take an example, here is another highbeam link http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-155583389.html. Its published in Manila Bulletin and its not a press release, maybe there are some lobbying behind but that is the case in every other article published. There are a thousand stories like these. Where do you think the information about Photoshop comes from?

Furthermore, as stated in this press release http://www10.mcadcafe.com/nbc/articles/view_article.php?articleid=249135&interstitial_displayed=Yes Inventor is the dominating brand in 3D CAD packages with more seats than Pro/ENGINEER, SolidEdge, SolidWorks and Catia. A more reliable source on marketshare is http://www.jonpeddie.com/publications/cad_report/ but it is not free. My opinion is that the market leaders should be covered by Wikipedia.

Finally some more sources:

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-14758983.html] from The_Charleston_Gazette

http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2001/08/30/182199/The-part-technology-played-in-the-raising-of-the-Kursk.htm from ComputerWeekly

http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=sv&ie=UTF-8&layout=1&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyteknik.se%2Fnyheter%2Fit_telekom%2Fallmant%2Farticle8849.ece&sl=sv&tl=en from http://nyteknik.se translated with Google translate.

The Structural engineer, Volym 82‎ - Page 140, London,The Institution

Regards

Erikhansson1 (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

OK, if you've got some good sources, fill out the article. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Advertising

No doubt that Autodesk Inventor is notable. The problem I see is a complete lack of references from WP:RS. I mean, seriously now, a list of releases with internal code names? Anyone guess where that came from? This article is close to the threshold of being spam. 68.106.251.57 (talk) 15:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

DuraShutter laminate product innovation

Patent No: 6,622,433, Patent No. 6,854,211, Patent No: 7,055,231, Patent No: 7,987,565, Patent No: 7,536,766 B1, Patent No: 8,091,28 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blachley001 (talk • contribs) 00:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Autodesk Inventor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090619152541/http://usa.autodesk.com:80/adsk/servlet/index?siteID=123112&id=10466385 to http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/index?siteID=123112&id=10466385
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100124115453/http://discussion.autodesk.com:80/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=70 to http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=70

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Version 2021 available

https://www.autodesk.com/products/inventor/new-features — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6D40:3491:A701:112A:4E2A:DDD2:9151 (talk) 01:00, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Version 2022 Available

https://www.reddit.com/r/AutodeskInventor/comments/ml812n/autodesk_inventor_2022_is_now_available/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWOU2bXQC0E — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.228.235.50 (talk) 12:28, 6 April 2021 (UTC)