Talk:Autogenous pressurization
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Yoninah in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Autogenous pressurization article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A fact from Autogenous pressurization appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:44, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
( )
... that the Space Shuttle used autogenous pressurization to keep its Space Shuttle external fuel tank pressurised after engine ignition?- ALT0a: ... that the Space Shuttle used autogenous pressurization to keep its external fuel tank pressurized after engine ignition?
- ALT1:... that autogenous pressurization was used to keep the Space Shuttle external fuel tank pressurized after engine ignition?
Created/expanded by Seddon (talk). Self-nominated at 00:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC).
New (created 19th), just about long enough (1791 characters). Referenced and in scope, but it would be good if it had more links in the text. Passes copyvio check. QPQ not needed (this is the user's second DYK). ALT1 looks best to me, the original one would also be OK if the repetition of 'Space Shuttle' is removed. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 11:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Seddon I have restored the thread so I could see what Mike Peel was talking about. In future, please do not edit existing hooks, but add new hooks as alts at the end of the thread. It's up to the reviewer to strike hooks. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
The article has a clarification tag and also needs some more links to scientific terms. Yoninah (talk) 17:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: - Added more articles links, fixed clarification and fixed citation. Seddon talk 13:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Seddon: Thank you. But I don't see the hook fact about the Space Shuttle external fuel tank in the article? Yoninah (talk) 00:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Seddon and Yoninah: The sentence is there now. --evrik (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. Restoring tick for review begun by Mike Peel. Yoninah (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2020 (UTC)