Talk:Automated optical inspection

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Verification

edit

I removed the verify tag after I've added some external links. Please let me know if those are not sufficient and what kind of other information is needed to fully remove the said tags. Thanks. <font color="lighgray">[--J</font><font color="gray">C--]</font> 06:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Let's be unbiased

edit

I've put back the information where it says about elimination of AOI in the later process of product LCM. This is the industry standard to use AOI as an introductory with the early product life cycle. Also I am not an advocate of ICT, but manufacturing industry in general will mostly (if not all) accept ICT as permanent primary solution for PCB test. If taking the statement out again, because a person has biased feeling for AOI test or has personal interest for AOI (works for a company that sells AOI instruments/fixtures/etc), we would ask them to pause for a while and rethink before deleting that item. Please post your concerns and reason here too. Thanks. |--JC--| 02:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Updated Information

edit

I'd like to see in this article (and in Machine Vision) an update on speeds, capacities and applications. The current article should include applications inspecting banknote, securities and other forms of compliance printing (more than just circuit boards et al). Further, Optical Inspection has expanded to test for LCH (Luminence, Chroma and Hue) variation in realtime. Machine Vision also had a request for commercial references, much as can be seen in the article Virtualization. This would prove tremendously helpful especially as this technology is only now capable of approaching needed application speeds in print, packaging and substrate manufacture. Please post your advisements. Many thanks, Nhbaldwin (talk) 23:35, 5 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Terminology

edit

This article uses terms such as 'tombstoning' and 'billboarding' which need to be defined. LorenzoB (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Typical Vendors

edit

Please research who are typical vendors in more detail and add these, or remove this section completely as it appears to promote specific companies. Also, the detail is incorrect. For instance Teradyne left the AOI business in 2004. Hence to include them in the typical vendors section is incorrect. There are many typical vendors which could be listed who are not noted such as:

Mirtec
Yestech
Machine Vision Products
Viscom
VI Technology
Aleader
TRI (Test Research Institute)
Parmi
Koh Young
SONY
Retinae
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.216.169.0 (talk) 08:24, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please review this section.

Visiongurus (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Automated optical inspection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply