 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Hey Transcendental
You: "Reverted a few additions as they are very obscure and use bad grammar."
I am astonished how fast Deleters tend to work, and delete too fast very useful information.
Couldn't You just put that into good grammar?
Too much work?
Automatic-tracking Satellite Dishes for stationary receptions are much more popular due to much lower price than:
Automatic-tracking Satellite Dishes for reception in motion, which are much much more expensive for end user.
Both are somehow mobile, and slow minded person can not even see benefits of mentioning the cheaper one.
I used this odd style on purpose that someone could see more easily more benefits.
And style is not grammar.
But slow minded person usually dwell in richer countries, and You very fast see benefits of cheaper devices in countries with 4x-8x-16x times lower wage and at least 2 times higher prices.
Even when you are rich in poorer countries you see benefits of cheaper devices.
And let me tell you:
wikipedia in English is not just read and written in rich and vast West.
Tent Dwelling is just popular Holiday activity, and you are encourage to put that in better grammar and style.
Not just most lazy activity:
extensive spontaneous deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.202.138 (talk) 20:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
- It is example of Satellite dish designed primary for stationary reception.
- It can be mounted on very slow traveling vehicles or boats, but as it is now it is not designed to satisfy mobile high speed automatic tracking during high speed motion.
- It will not be able to cope with fast changing 6DOF.
- It is possible to maintain certain level of reception as dish is capable of achieving high bandwidth bitrate,
- however one is not possible to change fast all parameters of 6DOF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.201.79 (talk) 17:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Some Topic are Notable
editSome Topic are Notable and common, despite any mention in Text articles… And I am sure, a lot of Topic not talk much has mach more users in terms of practical involvment among population, than a lot of wikipedia languages had reading able users though whole history… — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.201.79 (talk) 13:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC)