Talk:Automatic milking

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 209.81.121.2 in topic Nice work

Nice work

edit

Don't know much about the subject, but holy cow, nice work, good sources. Ok, that was really lame, don't stone me or anything. - Taxman Talk 20:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

automatic is a resourcful way of malking — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.81.121.2 (talk) 14:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

edit

There have been a lot of edits since I created this article, but sadly I can't see much improvement in content over the original (the grammar, spelling and wikification is great). It is perhaps a more insiduous type of vandalism to slightly bias an article in favour of one side, as seems to be the case here. Plus, a black & white graphic that I was quite proud of was deleted at some early stage. Now I'd do something about if my login still worked, but re-registration is too daunting. Keep up the good work. [the formerly know as] jimbo3 [and now unknown as] 193.120.116.177 (talk) 20:42, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request photograph of the VMS system

edit

Acidburn24m (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

capacity

edit

one machine can handle 69 cows 3 times daily.wdl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.146.23.84 (talk) 04:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

== support for automatic cow blowing? == some like to blow cows

As far as I know, these machines lack support for cow blowing. Has anyone looked into the matter? Any research?

In most countries the labor cost of traditional cow blowing would be completely unreasonable. There might even be worker safety regulations that prevent it. Automatic systems dramatically change the situation. With automatic systems, cow blowing could be feasable in developed nations.

(and yes, this is still done today where the labor market allows it; there is video if you google for: milk anus cow)

50.89.71.42 (talk) 05:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Automatic milking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:26, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

cows will run you over