Talk:Automatic seat belts

Compacted discussion

In the 1950’s the auto industry tested airbags and found them superior to automatic belts of that period as a result of their inferior performance; automatic belts were not seriously pursued until the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) took steps in 1969 to require airbags to all motor vehicles. The industry immediately switched gears and argued against airbags. This switch contradicted market studies by the manufacturers that showed consumers preferred airbags to automatic belts. Automatic belts were a cheaper form of passive restraints rather than an airbag.

File:Automatic seat belt.jpg

Simple automatic belt systems cost $50-$200 less than airbag systems.

The first to sell automatic seat belts was Volkswagen, with the 1975 VW Rabbit, which had a door-mounted automatic shoulder belt (BUT NO LAP BELT). Immediately the injuries began. Upon front impact, the occupant’s torso slipped under belt, but the head and necks catches on the shoulder belt, essentially “clothesline” the occupant, causing broken necks, spinal cord injuries and death. Unfortunately, some automakers, including Hyundai, continued to equip vehicles with shoulder only belts up through 1989 with the Hyundai Excel. Later many automakers included a manual lap belt with the automatic shoulder belt. The problem with this “improvement” was most consumers forgot to wear the manual lap belt and while some didn’t even know there vehicles had them. The injuries to the occupants continued, as more and more of the automatic shoulder belts with no lap belts, began to appear in many of the late 1970’s and into the 1990’s. As the DOT pushed forward with the passive restraint rules, the automakers concentrated on developing automatic belts that were easier to use but were less protective and less expensive than air bags.

As automatic belts came into use, their defects and failures became apparent. Automatic shoulder belts with separate manual lap belts had very low lap belt use rates because the automatic feature of the shoulder belt engaging lulled occupants into forgetting to buckle their lap belts. The more cumbersome door-mounted belts were often detached by the users rendering them ineffective. The shoulder-strap-only belts often caused serious neck injuries and even decapitated occupants; and door mounted belts completely failed to protect when doors opened in crashes, as they do 10% of the time. The failures of automatic belts are showing up in a growing number of personal injury lawsuits that will soon grow into a flood. Congress finally killed automatic belts. In an amendment to the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Congress required all new cars to have full-front seat airbags by September 1, 1997, with light trucks and vans having them by September 1, 1998.

Delete section

This section pretty blatantly doesn't cite any sources, just thought I'd tag it first before I erased it. 69.221.114.153 (talk) 20:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't think this should be deleted. It's interesting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.167.106.242 (talk) 18:06, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

WRONG! That is such an overused, baseless argument that we already have a specific thing about it: WP:INTERESTING. Since the delete-section tag has been up for over a week, since no one has fixed or contributed anything to that section, since no one seems to care, and since the section appears to all be original research; I'm deleting it. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Merge & Redirect

This short article ought to be merged into Seat belt. Automatic seat belts were used only very briefly, and almost entirely in just one country; there is little basis for meaningful expansion of this article's content, but when integrated into Seat belt, the subject of automatic belts can be presented in better historical and technical context and detail. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C21:36, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Globalize template

I've removed the Globalize template. This article focuses on automatic seat belts in America, because that's the only market where they were used. Internationalisation would consist of a one-line statement to that effect. Besides, this article really ought to be merged into Seat belt. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C16:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

• I am actually not so convinced anymore that it can't stand alone: it is also an interesting testcase of how Democratic and Republican administrations have dealt with public safety issues and the (auto) industry. Drmies (talk) 02:49, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

The article does not really make it clear at all that these were only issued in the US. --Zilog Jones (talk) 15:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)