Talk:Automotive Service Excellence

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Tangurena in topic Probably useless anecdote

Fair use rationale for Image:ASE certified.png

edit
 

Image:ASE certified.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Probably useless anecdote

edit

Not that it matters, but I used to work in Broward County, Florida and had to pass the ASE test (the electrical one, A-6 to be precise) in order for my then-employer to meet the county requirements for licensure. We sold, installed and repaired auto radios, so the company had to get licensed. The regulations were passed in both Broward and Miami-Dade counties back in 1992 at the same time. I was amazed at the number of folks who had worked in the industry for years who were incapable of passing these tests. Even after I quit and went to work somewhere else, the company needed me to keep my cert active, as each certified technician was legally allowed to "supervise" up to 2 "trainees" (a trainee was effectively anyone who was not certified, either because they could not pass the test, or because they had not worked in the industry for the required 2 year period for certification) pp. 6-7, Sec. 20-176.83. Trainee permit.. One of my most precious memories of the place after quitting was getting called to come in more than 1 year after quitting, and I was handed the test booklet to renew my certification (the certs are good for 5 years before needing to be renewed). Boss says "we'll pay for it" (previously, I had to pay for it out of my own pocket). After glancing at it, I was able to hand it back, make my biggest smile possible and say "I can't register for this, the deadline was a month ago." It was a very dysfunctional place, and I was glad to be gone. They've since gone out of business, but for other reasons than the $1000/week fines for violations that were in effect at that time. Tangurena (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply