Talk:Autonomous Agrarian Union
A fact from Autonomous Agrarian Union appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 December 2008, and was viewed approximately 265 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kurtyak's age
editThis German source ("Deutsche Gesandtschaftsberichte aus Prag By Manfred Alexander, Heidrun Dolezel, Stephan Dolezel, Germany Gesandtschaft (Czechoslovakia)") gives his year of birth as 1888. 76.97.245.5 (talk) 09:33, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! --Soman (talk) 10:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
cs page
editI've tried to find something on this party in the cs.wikipedia and have so far come up empty. Although the ruthenians (rusyns) apparently were something like the Russian minority in Czechoslovakia, I find it odd to have a Russian translation for a Czechoslovakian party rather than a Czech one in the intro. 76.97.245.5 (talk) 09:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- This is analogous to other cases were names of parties using minority languages have articles, like Batasuna, Poalei Zion, etc.. I'm not saying that a Czech (or Slovak, for that matter) cannot be included if such a name was used in Czechoslovak newsmedia at the time, but we should have the name that was used by the party itself. The source that I used to create the article (a German book) gave the name simply as Avtonomski zemledelskij sojuz, without specifying if it was in Russian, Rusyn or Ukrainian language. --Soman (talk) 10:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Found s.th in cs "Autonomní zemědělský sojuz" is mentioned in Volby_1935 [1] I guess that would then be the party's Czech name. It's not big enough for them to have a page, it seems.76.97.245.5 (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- It seems Autonomní zemědělský sojuz is just a transliteration from Russian/Rusyn, google translate doesn't recognize 'sojuz' as a Czech word. Note that the same cs wiki article Volby 1935 uses the slovak name Hlinkova slovenská ľudová strana, rather than the Czech Hlinkova slovenská lidová strana. But German and Polish party names are translated into Czech. It appears that multilingualism wasn't consequent in CSR at the time. --Soman (talk) 11:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Speaking of googling, 18 ghits aren't that much. There is some indication, though that the transliterated version was what was used. This site gives translations for the German names, but leaves AZS as is. [2]. This seems to be from the minority area: [3]. BTW they have a different election date "1923" for the 21,161 votes mentioned in the article. Those don't seem to have been parliamentary elections, though. The "house of representative" elections were 1920, 1925, 1929 and 1935. Hope this helps.76.97.245.5 (talk) 12:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Google translate says the 1923
(1924?)elections were municipal elections. --Soman (talk) 12:34, 22 December 2008 (UTC)- The answer is given at http://www2.czso.cz/csu/2006edicniplan.nsf/o/4219-06-1920_az_1935-prehled_vysledku_voleb_do_narodniho_shromazdeni_v_obdobi_1920___1935 , see the footnote in the end saying Poznámka: V roce 1920 se nekonaly volby na území Podkarpatské Rusi, dodatečně byly uskutečněny v roce 1924., translated "Note: In 1920, the elections did not take on the territory of Sub-Carpathian Ukraine, subsequently were made in 1924." --Soman (talk) 12:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Google translate says the 1923
- Speaking of googling, 18 ghits aren't that much. There is some indication, though that the transliterated version was what was used. This site gives translations for the German names, but leaves AZS as is. [2]. This seems to be from the minority area: [3]. BTW they have a different election date "1923" for the 21,161 votes mentioned in the article. Those don't seem to have been parliamentary elections, though. The "house of representative" elections were 1920, 1925, 1929 and 1935. Hope this helps.76.97.245.5 (talk) 12:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- It seems Autonomní zemědělský sojuz is just a transliteration from Russian/Rusyn, google translate doesn't recognize 'sojuz' as a Czech word. Note that the same cs wiki article Volby 1935 uses the slovak name Hlinkova slovenská ľudová strana, rather than the Czech Hlinkova slovenská lidová strana. But German and Polish party names are translated into Czech. It appears that multilingualism wasn't consequent in CSR at the time. --Soman (talk) 11:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Found s.th in cs "Autonomní zemědělský sojuz" is mentioned in Volby_1935 [1] I guess that would then be the party's Czech name. It's not big enough for them to have a page, it seems.76.97.245.5 (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Autonomous Agrarian Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080913053614/http://www.granik.org:80/history/index.php?s_id=39 to http://granik.org/history/index.php?s_id=39&&c_id=52&&m_id=793
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://allaaria.ru/vid/bookscontent.php3-quest-b-eq-24-and-c-eq-633
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC)