Talk:Autonomous Orthodox Metropolia of North and South America and the British Isles

Full Disclosure

Per the COI guidelines, I am revealing any potential confilcts of interest. The primary author of this article is a Deacon in the Autonomous Orthodox Metropolia being referenced in the article. I've accepted no favor or renumeration for the article, nor was I prompted for it, nor do I intend to write the article for propagandistic purposes. I previously worked on the Holy Synod of Milan article until the schism and simply thought, as half of the Synod is comprised of the American Parishes that an article was worth mentioning. Suaiden (talk) 06:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because copyright information was sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. I am an authorized agent to reproduce this information of the organization's website, as well as the primary author of the cited text.

Contested deletion

Further, only one section, "Early History", cites the website text.

To mark it for deletion took a few minutes. Attempting to accomodate the requests to remove it from cache seems to be taking somewhat longer. Suaiden (talk) 00:24, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Box upon box

I am a little dumbfounded as to why I am being called on "neutrality". Did it help to add a foreign news source? To source the article with Milan's own words?

Would newspaper articles about parishes help? Are they even relevant?

And this is the second or third time an editor has submitted some box on the top indicating that if this isn't fixed now it will be deleted. It's starting to feel a little harrassing.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Suaiden (talk • contribs)

The conflict of interest tag was added due to your comment here [1] where you stated you have a connection with the subject of the article. I encourage you to review the conflict of interest guidelines, as it will make your editing experience much more enjoyable. Best of luck with your editing. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 03:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism

A user named Volodymyr continues to try to insert false information and is deleting factual information in the article. There is no "deposition", because the "Milan Synod" is now made up of two retired Bishops, and two priests who gave up their episcopate to join the Moscow Patriarchate. This is a desperate attempt to regain lost credibility, since there are few parishes left in Italy that are still part of the Muscovite mission. — FrJosephSuaiden (talk) 23:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Autonomous Orthodox Metropolia of North and South America and the British Isles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120724144955/http://www.orthodoxmetropolia.org/p/history.html to http://orthodoxmetropolia.org/p/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)