Talk:autorun.inf

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

copied from Microsoft

edit

This seems to be a direct copy of Microsoft content!! http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc144200(VS.85).aspx#Shellexecute

Hardly. The article resembles that page but then it would, wouldn't it... Just because I copied the entry definitions from that page doesn't make it a violation of anything. There's a standard way of writing command lines and setting defintions - with square brackets meaning optional etc etc. - so there's no other way of writing it and why would I.
Given that wikipedia is not original research by definition, everything on wikipedia is a rewrite of existing content. There were 7 articles under the AutoRun and AutoPlay MSDN tree which I had to read about a million times just to write an article that was consistent.
Carveone (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Windows 7

edit

Thanks to 69.232.153.100 for the Win7 edit, genuinely useful information from someone. Makes a change. This info has citable reference in the "Autorun.inf Entries" MSDN article so I made small changes which aren't meant to be pissy or pedantic! This is information which wasn't available when I added the Windows 7 section (yeah, I winged it and got it wrong).

Daniel Martin, MVP, has said that Windows 7 still parses autorun.inf files and, for non DRIVE_CDROM types, ignores all [autorun] section entries except icon= and label= settings. Easily provable by looking in the MountPoints2 mount cache in the registry. The guy knows what he's talking about if he references that registry entry! The comment addition to the MSDN "Autorun.inf entries" article is precisely worded - thanks to Daniel for that contribution and leaving no doubt as to what is and isn't parsed.

Carveone (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Virus

edit

Whenever I plug an external hard drive or memory stick in, my antivirus says autorun.inf is a worm. Do anti-virus programmes view it as a virus? or does a virus mimic the file? Sweetie candykim (talk) 19:05, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

prevent Autorun.inf execution

edit

Is it possible to disable AutoRun but keep AutoPlay? How?

AutoRun is dangerous, and should generally be disabled. But, it would be convenient to still be able to automatically play inserted audio CDs and video DVDs. Is this possible?

There is a registry trick to kill autorun.inf processing, credited to Nick Brown:

REGEDIT4
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
     NT\CurrentVersion\IniFileMapping\Autorun.inf] @="@SYS:DoesNotExist"
  • nickbrown-france.blogspot.com/2007/10/memory-stick-worms.html
  • blogs.computerworld.com/the_best_way_to_disable_autorun_to_be_protected_from_infected_usb_flash_drives
  • antivirus.about.com/od/securitytips/ht/autorun.htm

Basic AutoPlay seems to keep functioning in XP after this registry tweak. This change completely inhibits the ability to run autorun.inf files, so installing some software then requires the ability to view and understand such files, to find the .exe file that needs to be installed.-96.233.20.116 (talk) 20:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Years wanting to harness autorun.inf processing

edit

But information is missing, incomplete and informal. Syntax is not formally specified. This text has to update for new versions of the Operating System. Only tested information should be allowed in the text or noted as untested or unreliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.96.225 (talk) 07:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Autorun.inf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Citation needed?

edit

I think this article no longer needs more citations.--Support Wikipedia, support free sharing of knowledge 08:15, 29 November 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by BamLifa (talkcontribs)