Talk:Available name
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge of Unavailable name into Available name
 | The contents of the Unavailable name page were merged into Available name on 7 August 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question from confused botanist
editCan someone add some links to appropriate parts of the zoological code for the statement that an available name must "be published in a timely fashion by a reputable source"? That seems so completely different from the spirit of the botanical code, that it would be interesting to see what is involved. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 16:46, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Proposed merge of Unavailable name into Available name
editShould be the same article (one is opposite of the other), but separate wikidata items (like it already is). Artoria2e5 🌉 16:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the polarity of the merge should be as you have proposed it; there are many fewer unique links to Unavailable name than to Available name, so there will be less confusion and link editing needed that way. My inclination at this point is to agree with the merge proposal. Dyanega (talk) 17:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support - no need to keep these strictly interrelated terms separate, especially when the articles are this short. FunkMonk (talk) 15:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per the above comments. -SlvrHwk (talk) 23:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
