Wikipedia

Talk:Avalon, California

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 152.131.10.75 in topic Politics graph


This page is redirected to from Avalon Bay (REIT) Page. That page described the apartment AvalonBay Communities, Inc., an equity REIT. Many Wikipedia pages link to that page, but are now redirected to this "Avalon, CA" page. This is very wrong. Instead Avalon Bay needs to continue to resolve to the REIT page (which I can no longer find) so that all the links are not broken. If it is desired to change that, then at least first change the Wikipedia Pages that link to Avalon Bay, intending to link to the REIT, link to Avalon Bay Communities page (REIT).

Xkit (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


Airport

edit
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What is the Catalina Airport-In-The-Sky, can someone add a clarification to the wiki? --Coryma 16:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

The current article for the Catalina Airport is barely a stub and desperately needs to be improved and enlarged. If you would like to do that, I will try to help you. BlankVerse 10:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Electricity

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Where does Catalina get its electricity from?

WikiProject California Suggestions

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago14 comments2 people in discussion

I'm reposting some constructive criticism that this page received from members of WikiProject California on how this page can be improved:

  • It should probably have a Cityscape section with at least a brief paragraph describing the towns layout. You might want to take a look at San Francisco (a recently reviewed Featured Article) for general structure ideas.
In progress, I added a cityscape section, but it probably needs some serious cleaning up along with references.--mcd51 (talk) 04:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Done, I've done as much as I can to improve this section. Further improvement will probably need a second set of eyes.--mcd51 (talk) 01:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Done, all citations have been formatted with the {{cite}} format--mcd51 (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • The Education section needs expansion into a full paragraph.
Done, the education section is now expanded throughout.--mcd51 (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
  • Should add some images to illustrate Government (picture of city hall maybe), Education (picture of a school?), and demographics (a chart of some sort).
In progress, See below for demographics. I've found a few pictures of the school (the Lancer mascot logo here) and the city hall (from the City of Avalon website here). These were taken respectively from the city and school websites. Is there any way I can legally get these images onto Commons?
Done, plenty of pictures on this page now--mcd51 (talk) 05:53, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Done, a weather infobox has been added to the page--mcd51 (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Done, data was pulled from the US Census and an infographic was added--mcd51 (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
In terms of importance I've placed it at Low importance because the population is less than 25,000. An easy way to check what is expected for a city article is to take a look at Featured Articles like San Francisco, Manchester, England or Cleveland, Ohio. I hope that helps. -Optigan13 (talk) 00:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for looking at the page and giving me some advice. I wonder, though, if Avalon's current rating importance rating of "Low" isn't accurate. I understand that the guidelines above state that settlements with less than 25,000 should generally be classified as "Low" Importance. However, I would say that Avalon, CA has mitigating circumstances that push its importance past that of other podunk California cities
Avalon is one of the few major resort communities serving Southern California. As a tourist destination, Avalon has averaged from 750,000-900,000 visitors per year over the last 20 years (Catalina Island Chamber of Commerce Visitor Counts). This compares favorably to Mission San Juan Capistrano, which receives close to 500,000 visitors per year. Additionally, the California Travel & Tourism Commission rates Catalina Island as one of its top five destinations in the Greater Los Angeles Area [1], with Avalon being the central point of tourism for the entire Island. I'd like to hear your feedback on this. Thanks again for looking at the page.
I understand what you're saying but I'd like to keep the importance rating where it's at for now. There's currently 13,329 articles without an importance rating and a lot of automation is needed to bring that down. If there's some straightforward way to add in tourism, household income, and the host of other factors that affect the relative importance of a settlement to California where you could plug it into a bot to get a consistent and easy to understand result I'd like to do it. Also bear in mind that the importance scale is only one of several factors consider for release versions, which also includes external interest including hits, as well as quality score. Project importance shouldn't necessarily affect what you work on. Would you mind if we just leave it where it is for now? I'd like to finish flushing out the importance categories above. Then hopefully give everything an importance category, and then start adjusting articles importance assessments. -Optigan13 (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
That seems fair. I was going to continue to work on it anyways even if it retained its rating of low. Besides, now that I've had a chance to think about it more, it seems like Santa Catalina Island, California (which is unrated right now) would be a more comprehensive article that would go higher on the importance list. I'll probably start working on that article once I finish working on the changes you suggested for the Avalon page. Thanks for all your input, Optigan13. It's very helpful for a new contributor like me.--mcd51 (talk) 01:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Any help implementing these changes would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! mcd51 (talk) 00:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

More feedback from the WikiProject page:

A couple thoughts
  • Not sure if I would specify the phone information in the lead, but maybe that could work if the prose was tweaked a bit of something. See WP:LEAD.
  • If you're going to link Tongva you should probably link the full name as [[Tongva|Gabrielino/Tongva]].
  • "tribe, who, having" You might want to drop the commas, I don't know if you need to have the readers pause there.
  • Probably link George Shatto, he bought the island of Catalina, he might be notable.
  • Might need to adjust the sentence about the Banning brothers improvements, it's a bit of a run on.
  • Unfortunately I think that image will have to go. It looks good, but in order for the fair use to work it needs to be more than decoration, the image or something it illustrates have to be discussed. (See Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria).
  • In 1929, Wrigley built the Catalina Casino was built in 1929 over ...
  • The Santa Catalina Island Company maintained maintains control of ...
  • Make sure to use {{convert}} throughout for the measurements, there's several that need it, like 22 miles in the geography section. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) for the whole story on those.
  • Explain what the acronym P.L.A.Y. stands for when you first use it.
  • "but a single principal, currently Joe Carlson, administers all three levels of education." I don't think you need to name the school principal.
I've rerated as a B, and at this point I would recommend you consider starting to take it through the more formal content processes starting with a WP:Peer review with suggestions on possibly going to WP:GAN or even WP:FAN eventually. I'm pretty weak on the specific WP:Manual of Style issues, and on tightening prose. You may be able to find someone in one of those forums to help you. -Optigan13 (talk) 08:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Minor changes committed, will try to address most of these concerns before taking it to peer review--mcd51 (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
OK, I've looked at this article so many times I can't tell what's good or bad anymore. I think it's ready for a peer review, to get it up to Good Article level.--mcd51 (talk) 01:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image (File:Avlaon Harbor.jpg)

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avlaon Harbor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Optigan13 (talk) 06:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reversed image?

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Another editor has pointed out that File:Avlaon Harbor.jpg, an archive image used here, was apparently scanned in reverse -- or so they think. Can another active editor confirm the reversal? The original image looks right to me. See File history at the image. Thanks in advance, Pete Tillman (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done & settled. Present version should be right. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 04:16, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry, but it looks like we may not be able to use this image due to copyright issues (see Optigan13's comment above in "WikiProject California Suggestions") We might be able to use it if we add a culture section that discusses the plein air festival held on the island every year. Let me know if this is something that you want me to pursue, or if you want to write one yourself.--mcd51 (talk) 00:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sigh. WP foolishness re CC-NC surfaces again. Note that the photo is free-licensed for noncommercial use (ie, by nonprofits like Wikipedia) but, due to (imo) ideological pig-headedness on the part of the Wikimedia board, we can't use it, because some hypothetical future commercial user might not be able to read the license. </rant> Sigh2, Pete Tillman (talk) 01:04, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced statement

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I searched all over, but couldn't find any reliable sources for the following statement:

  • The Bannings also improved the standard of Avalon's beach by erecting a sea-wall and adding "spoonholders" or covered benches, building a bath house. For additional habitation, the Bannings erected close to one hundred tents throughout Avalon's canyon (often called "tent cities"). These tents were created so that if the expense of a hotel was too much, a visitor could rent out a tent for the bargain price of $7.50 per week. To this day, many homes in Avalon are still in possession of the same tents that stood in that spot over a century ago.

Feel free to add it back in if you can source it.mcd51 (talk) 16:51, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply


This page is redirected to from Avalon Bay (REIT) Page. That page described the apartment AvalonBay Communities, Inc., an equity REIT. Many pages had linked to that page, for the REIT, now get redirected here, and that is a problem.

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Avalon, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Avalon, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Avalon, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Record High Temperature in Climate Data Completely Incorrect

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The climate graph for Avalon, CA, now has a record high of 116 degrees on July 6, 2018 - which would be a full 12 degrees higher than the previous record high. A quick search of the link to that figure does not show that number at all, and a search of the Weather Almanac shows the (truly record high) temperature that day reached 105.1. So July 6, 2018, did record an all time high - but someone decided to add another 11 degrees with no scientific basis or links.

https://www.almanac.com/weather/history/CA/Avalon/2018-07-06 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.234.66.195 (talk) 16:30, 15 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Politics graph

edit
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed that the data for the 2004 presidential election includes about 15,000 votes. IF this is accurate, a statement explaining such an extreme outlier should be included. 152.131.10.75 (talk) 20:03, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Avalon,_California&oldid=1251366635"