Talk:Avengers (Marvel Cinematic Universe)/GA2

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: BigLordFlash (talk · contribs) 16:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'm going to review this one. If you have any questions, just talk with me! BigLordFlash^talk 16:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	I left some comments below.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	It complies with everything.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	All good.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I left some comments below.
	2c. it contains no original research.	All good.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	All good.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	it covers all main aspects.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	It's neutral.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	It's stable.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All good.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All media are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

I'm going to leave some comments. It's very close to become a GA!

The Blip:

• Thanos defeats Hulk, who is then sent to Earth to inform Stephen Strange - sent by who?

  Fixed -- ZooBlazer

• With Banner unable to transform, Strange is captured and taken to their spaceship - it's a little confusing, it seems like the two pieces of information don't fit together

  Reworded -- ZooBlazer

• killing Loki and subduing Thor. (...) Thor, wielding his Stormbreaker axe, Rocket, and Groot also arrive and join the battle - I think there is an important part of the story about Thor missing here.

  That info fits more on the Thor article than this one. -- ZooBlazer

Reversing the Blip:

• Thor and Rocket retrieve the Reality Stone from Asgard - a past, present or future Asgard? The article doesn't say that Asgard was destroyed, it just says that there are Asgard refugees.

  Reworded -- ZooBlazer

Reception:

• The film was referred to as "Avengers 2.5" by commentators and fans, given the ensemble nature of the cast resembled that of the Avengers films, and the fact that the film no longer felt centered around Captain America. - I think there are too many sources in one sentence.

  Removed one of the refs. -- ZooBlazer

Missing sources in "Other characters" and "What If...? (2021–present)" sections. BigLordFlash^talk 18:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Added refs. I think I've addressed all of your concerns @BigLordFlash. Let me know if there's anything else. -- ZooBlazer 21:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

@ZooBlazer: About the Thor's journey in Infinity War, it still doesn't make sense because when u are reading the section, it feels like he was subdued by Thanos and then he appears out of nowhere using the Stormbreaker and with two Guardians of the Galaxy with no explanation. BigLordFlash^talk 22:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

@BigLordFlash Is it better now? -- ZooBlazer 23:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

@BigLordFlash I'm glad to see that this article has finally been reviewed! As the co-nominee, I did some CE for the article. I think Thor's journey in the IW section should be better clarified now, and the Avengers 2.5 comment currently shouldn't be WP:CITEKILL, as ZooBlazer took care of most, if not all, of the issues. Dcdiehardfan (talk) 04:25, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

It seems all good to me! I'm going to pass this one. You really did a great job! Congratulations! :) BigLordFlash^talk 13:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.