Talk:Avro Canada CF-103/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Bzuk in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Fix the small problem with "coupled" noted by the awkward tag. Might do well to break up that long sentence.
- A. Prose quality:
- Fixed. Bzuk (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- B. MoS compliance:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Would do well to describe the structure in more detail. Is it pretty much the same as the CF-100?
- A. Major aspects:
- Added detail explaining the airframe fuselage structure was essentially the same but wing and tail surfaces had major alterations.Bzuk (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Failed, no response from editor.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, the changes were made but didn't know a response was necessary. Bzuk (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)