Talk:Axa Equitable Center
Axa Equitable Center has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 14, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Axa Equitable Center appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: uncontested move. DrKiernan (talk) 08:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
AXA Center → AXA Equitable Center – This is the accurate name of 787 Seventh Avenue. 24.103.42.39 (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 23 October 2013
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
AXA Equitable Center → AXA Equitable Building – Building official website uses this name[1]. Relisted. BDD (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC) 141.191.20.1 (talk) 16:28, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Oppose. The official name has little relevance, see the article naming policy. Andrewa (talk) 06:05, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
References
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on AXA Equitable Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070221044756/http://www.emporis.com:80/en/wm/bu/?id=116341 to http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=116341
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:20, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on AXA Equitable Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121121555/http://787nyc.com:80/ to http://787nyc.com
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121121555/http://787nyc.com:80/ to http://787nyc.com
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on AXA Equitable Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121121555/http://787nyc.com/ to http://787nyc.com/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://787nyc.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on AXA Equitable Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121120200421/http://www.aepgny.com/ to http://www.aepgny.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- ... that for the construction of the $200 million Axa Equitable Center (pictured), its namesake spent $7.5 million for artwork? Source: Gottlieb, Martin (September 21, 1984). "Equitable Life Will Mix Art and Commerce". The New York Times.
- ALT1:... that for the construction of Axa Equitable Center, its namesake spent $7.5 million for artwork, including a reported $3.1 million for a single set of murals? Source: Gottlieb, Martin (September 21, 1984). "Equitable Life Will Mix Art and Commerce". The New York Times.; Dunlap, David W. (February 14, 1984). "Equitable Purchases Benton Mural 'America Today,' Keeping It in the City". The New York Times.
- ALT2:... that for the construction of Axa Equitable Center, its namesake was said to have "heeded Horace Greeley's dictum, 'Go West'", despite merely moving next door? Source: "East side, west side ..." (PDF). Architectural Record. 171: 55. May 1983.
- ALT3:... that the size of Axa Equitable Center's main entrance atrium, an 80-foot (24 m) cube, was influenced by a commercial holdout? Source: Hinds, Michael Decourcy (February 9, 1986). "Equitable Seeks Park Ave. Rents On Seventh Ave". The New York Times.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Filmed Before a Live Studio Audience
- Comment: more hooks pending
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 13:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: The article is new enough, long enough, no copyvio, well sourced. The hook is inline-cited and interesting. Good to go. Htanaungg (talk) 07:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Htanaungg: which hook? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Theleekycauldron, original hook is ok. 👌 Htanaungg (talk) 07:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Axa Equitable Center/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: A. C. Santacruz (talk · contribs) 21:59, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
edit- Source 1 does not load for me.
- Just as an aside, Hemingway Editor marks 24 of the 38 sentences in the Design section as hard to read. I'd agree with that, and recommend making the section more concise. Some measurements, for example, might be too detailed for the scope of the article.
- I've actually tried to use this before, but it makes very weird suggestions like substituting "Equitable" for "Complex". In fact, I was able to downgrade the difficulty for a lot of sentences by substituting a placeholder name instead of "Equitable". Nevertheless, I have trimmed some of the more minute details. Epicgenius (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- I agree with your reservations on Hemingway (I dont use it myself), just thought having a number would be useful (I probably should've used Grammarly for that). Trimming done. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 05:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- I've actually tried to use this before, but it makes very weird suggestions like substituting "Equitable" for "Complex". In fact, I was able to downgrade the difficulty for a lot of sentences by substituting a placeholder name instead of "Equitable". Nevertheless, I have trimmed some of the more minute details. Epicgenius (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Writing
edit- Second paragraph of "Site" section has many mentions of "East" making it hard to read.
- Reduced some of the usages of that word. Epicgenius (talk) 00:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- "Galleria" section has the same but for the word "galleria"
- Reduced some of the usages of that word, too. Epicgenius (talk) 00:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- "Impact section": "The artwork was received more positively" do you mean "... by other architecture critics/publications."? It feels like the thought is left unfinished here.
- Yes, that is what I mean. Thanks for bringing that up, I totally forgot about it. Epicgenius (talk) 00:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Illustration
edit- Design section really needs more images for how much text there is. While the text gives good information, it is too dense without additional images. Images from inside would be particularly useful, but an easy addition would be of the artwork mentioned (e.g. the large America Today mural).
- @A. C. Santacruz: Sadly, I can't get interior images myself, mostly because I do not have access to most of the interiors. I would be happy to upload any interior images should I come across any that are freely licensed. Also, the artwork may still be under copyright, unfortunately, as freedom of panorama in the US does not apply to artworks. For example, America Today is still under copyright until about 2025-2026. Epicgenius (talk) 00:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- That's unfortunate :( Don't worry about images then Epicgenius. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 05:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- @A. C. Santacruz: Sadly, I can't get interior images myself, mostly because I do not have access to most of the interiors. I would be happy to upload any interior images should I come across any that are freely licensed. Also, the artwork may still be under copyright, unfortunately, as freedom of panorama in the US does not apply to artworks. For example, America Today is still under copyright until about 2025-2026. Epicgenius (talk) 00:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Overall
editOn hold, some fixes needed.
After changes: Almost gtg, I'll just go and see if I can find typos before I promote. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 05:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Done. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 06:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Congratulations Epicgenius A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 06:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)